Dark Visors - Clear Vision |
|||||||
| The “Clear Vision” campaign has been launched to reverse the flawed decision taken by Roads Minister David Jamieson to sustain the Department for Transport (DfT) prohibition of dark visors, which have a minimum, light transmittance of 18%. “Clear Vision” upholds the majority decision taken by MAG members at the groups’ annual conference in 2002 supporting the use of dark visors by motorcyclists. The campaign will concentrate on writing a letter to your MP ensuring they are aware of motorcyclists’ views and the strength of feeling against the decision taken by the DfT. Despite the overwhelming recommendations of MAG members, riders generally and the majority of rider bodies for a change in the legislation to permit the daytime use of Dark Visors the Government has capitulated to the illusions of the safety lobby. The document contains all the information you require from background information to a sample letter to send to your MP, where to find him or her and how to become more active in motorcycling issues. The response to the consultation and lobbying on Dark Visors was done by the book. MAG influenced and implemented the full support of the National Motorcycle Council (NMC) but the DfT used the misguided conception that riders would misuse dark visors despite the major safety advantage for riders.” MAG remains convinced that the wearing of dark visors especially in conditions of glare would not present a danger to other vulnerable road users especially with recommended promotion of rider awareness and safety on the use of dark visors. Riders are being forced by the DfT despite the fear of prosecution to use dark visors not approved to a recognised standard in which impact resistance, optical qualities and colour filtering of an unknown quality which could adversely affect signal recognition etc, could be compromised. MAG’s Position Dark Visor use in daytime conditions can help to minimise the danger of disorientating glare, there are positive benefits in terms of rider behaviour to be had from dark visor usage, specifically that one aspect of venturesome behaviour (risk taking) may be reduced. We would further contend that a scientifically arrived at standard for dark visors should be arrived at urgently and implemented by way of the necessary legislation, thereby removing the current source of confusion and putting an end to unnecessary prosecutions. MAG will also continue to fight for a sensible solution to this problem through its positions on government task forces and standards bodies. Our aim is to persuade the minister not only to listen, but also to turn around a flawed decision to a fearless support of Dark Visors. “Clear Vision” is also available at www.mag-uk.org will be published in the members newspaper Streetbiker, the activists newsletter Network and Network Online at www.network.mag-uk.org Background Dark Visors Public Consultation - MAG Looking Ahead The Motorcycle Action Group welcomed in March 2002 the promise kept
by the government for public consultation on the future of *motorcyclists'
visors. MAG favoured Option 1 in the consultation to accept visor standards, which have a minimum light transmittance of 18%, the current “banned” Dark Visors used by motorcyclists. MAG contended that in the real world, sudden and unexpected glare can give riders a problem. Dark Visors reduce eyestrain in this circumstance, enabling riders to look longer and more carefully for potential hazards. The consultation document considered three options on Dark Visors. Option 1 - Accept visor standards which have a minimum light transmittance of 18% (as proposed by most members of the BSI Committee). This would bring visors into line with the minimum permitted light transmittance for motorcyclists' goggles. Option 2 - Accept visor standards which have a minimum light transmittance of around 34% (i.e. effectively the lowest level of the minimum range identified by ICE Ergonomics). Option 3 - Retain the present minimum allowed light transmittance of 50% (which is just above the top of the minimum range identified by ICE Ergonomics). In principle, current standards could be readily modified to cater for *photochromic, and perhaps polarised, visors when the technology is ready. MAG was led by the feelings expressed by our own members and riders generally, it was obvious that there was a substantial demand for a change in the law to permit the daytime usage of dark visors. Details of the original consultation are at http://www.roads.dtlr.gov.uk/consult/visors/index.htm It was noted that unlike previous consultations there was no electronic form to fill in requiring a need to print the documents out. Summary of the consultation responses can be found at http://www.roads.dft.gov.uk/consult/visors/responses/index.htm *Legislation requires that motorcyclists' visors comply with UN ECE Regulation
22.05 or British Standard BS4110:1979 (as amended). These standards currently
allow visors to have a light tint with a light *Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, Great Minster House, 76 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DR. www.roads.dft.gov.uk * Institute of Consumer Ergonomics (ICE Ergonomics Ltd) http://www.ice.co.uk.
Copies are also available from: Jayshree Lakha, Transport Technology Ergonomics
Centre, Research School in Ergonomics and Human Factors, Holywell Building,
Holywell Way, LOUGHBOROUGH, Leicestershire, LE11 3UZ *photochromic light-sensitive visor materials requiring long term technical
solutions for designs to lend themselves equally to both day and night
time use. The Motorcycle Lobby on Dark Visors The main UK motorcycling organisations meet under the umbrella grouping of the National Motorcycle Council (NMC). The NMC was set up to provide a forum for the different interests within the motorcycle and powered two-wheeler community in order to promote the use of powered two wheelers (PTWs) and establish them as a mode which is recognised to be an integral part of transport strategy. MAG along with the BMF and MRA implemented the full support of the NMC outlining in a joint document to the DfT the safety benefits, promotion of risk awareness, safety issues and enforcement regarding any changes in the legislation for visors. Organisations involved include: Motorcycle Action Group (MAG) Solution for Dark Visors SAFETY BENEFITS
As part of a legislative framework there would be a greater likelihood of riders complying by wearing approved visors and tinted visors during periods between lighting up times than in the current situation when visors with a deeper tint than 50% light transmittance are not legally available. With a tint of 18%, the sheer practicalities of using such a visor at night would discourage riders from using them after lighting up time. Without accurate data it is unknown how many motorcycle Road Traffic Collisions (RTCs) are attributed to the wearing of a dark visor at night or in conditions of poor light. While the current legislation remains in force a concerted safety, education and awareness programme cannot be promoted to uneducated riders presently using dark visors at night or in conditions of poor light. Therefore legislation accompanied by education and set guidelines, backed up by enforcement, could be an attributable factor in improving motorcycle safety. PROMOTION – EDUCATION - AWARENESS - GUIDELINES The Motorcycle Retailers Association (MRA), British Motorcyclists Federation (BMF), Motorcycle Action Group (MAG) Motor Cycle Industry (MCI) are represented on the British Standards Institute (BSI) Sub-Group PH/2/5. They would use their influence to include in the standard a requirement to mark tinted visors "Daytime Use Only". Instructions for use should also be printed on packaging, with particular reference to when it is appropriate and inappropriate to use them, care to prevent scratching, misting, etc. BSI may also wish to endorse or even join the publicity campaign when the revised standard is launched. ACTION PLEDGES BY NMC MEMBERS AND INTERESTED PARTIES Enforcement Agencies Manufacturers MCI would explore the possibility of the addition of a removable sticker
on each dark visor explaining its legal usage. Point of Sale Motorcycle Press Riders Groups - British Motorcyclists Federation Riders Groups - Motorcycle Action Group MRA and MRTA Use (MRA) representation in the BSI Sub-Group PH/2/5 to include in the
standard a requirement to mark tinted visors "Daytime Use Only"
and include instructions for use with particular reference to when it
is appropriate and inappropriate to use them, care to prevent scratching,
misting, etc in the packaging LARSOA Despatch Association Motoring organisations GUIDELINES TIMESCALES NMC November 2002 MAG will also continue to fight for a sensible solution to Dark Visors through the Government Advisory Group on Motorcycling (GAGM) and standards bodies such as The British Standards Institute (BSI). Not forgetting how to achieve our objectives through: Lobbying and meeting Members of Parliament Write to Your MP Suggested Letter to Your MP (Your MP) (Your address) (Date e.g. ??th January 2003 Changes in the Legislation for Motorcycle Helmet Visors Dear [Your MP] I am a member of your constituency. [ and a member of the Motorcycle Action Group/Club etc.] I am writing to raise my concerns on the recent decision following a consultation document by the Department for Transport to sustain its prohibition of dark helmet visors for day time use only. The announcement was made by the Transport Minister David Jamieson despite the support by the majority of motorcycling organisations to change the legislation. Legislation requires that motorcyclists' visors comply with UN ECE Regulation 22.05 or British Standard BS4110:1979 (as amended). These standards currently allow visors to have a light tint with a light transmission of no less that 50%. Motorcyclists requested a reduced to 18% of light transmission for day time use to bring visor standards in line with the current permitted light transmittance for motorcyclists' goggles. The light transmittance value relates to the percentage of visible light which the visor material allows to pass through. The greatest worry of riders is the effects of sun glare especially at this time of year. A rider who is not suffering glare discomfort is more inclined to look longer and more carefully for potential hazards than one that is dazzled. This is perhaps difficult to express in scientific terms. In layman's terms however, it is the difference between taking a quick squint into bright sunlight and thereafter taking a chance on perceived hazards, compared to taking a longer and more careful look with the benefit of a dark visor. There are some concerns that riders would be caught out in bad weather conditions of failing light and be tempted to ride with a dark visor in these conditions or at night, recommended promotion of rider awareness and safety on the use of dark visors would be undertaken. In these conditions a pair of cheap and nasty sunglasses can be worn by a rider under a clear visor yet a positive safety aid in the form of a dark visor is illegal. MAG [I/We] would respectfully request that you would write to the minister requesting why the majority of motorcyclists views were ignored or to put forward a Parliamentary Question to the minister on the issues above. I would welcome your comments on this issue. If there is any further information you require please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours [sincerely if you know their name or have dealt with them before] Your name What Next As you have read through this document you may want to include some extra points that you think are relevant or even some views of you own. If you receive a reply FOLLOW UP with a letter of thanks and answer any points the MP raised which were left unanswered. Send a copy of any letters received to Director of Public Affairs MAG UK PO BOX 750 Rugby CV21 3ZR. FAX 0870 444 8 449 Email public-affairs@mag-uk.org It's important that we update the overall picture of MPs' views so that we know where our support lies. MAG supporters get results by writing letters. As few as five individual letters to an MP make him or her sit up and take notice. Your MP is not compelled to adopt your views just because you are a constituent. It may be assumed that MPs take their constituents' views into account when forming their own but they can and sometimes do disregard a majority view held by those they represent If you do not have email and aren't sure who your MP is then you may phone the House of Commons Switchboard: 02072193000 If you have email then you can search the websites listed below. www.upmystreet.com put your postcode in and get lots of information including MP and council contacts. www.faxyourmp.com enables you to Fax your MP. www.mpexchange.co.uk allows you to campaign on certain issues. www.ukonline.gov.uk information on local and central government. www.tagish.co.uk/ links lists of Government department, councils, hospitals, Universities etc. MAG E-mail Lists mag-uk-info mag-uk-network mag-uk-activists Sending a blank (contents is ignored) e-mail to activate@mag-uk.org will subscribe you to all of these lists. The messages you receive on subscription will provide information on how to unsubscribe from the various lists.
Traditionally we've relied heavily on our network of local groups, reps and regional reps for this. This network is one of MAG's unique strengths, and we'll continue to use it and expand it. However, we recognise that that not all members can attend local meetings, and not all motorcyclists are MAG members. To address this, we're asking our active members to help us do the best possible job of assessing rider views on various matters. Many of our members are active on motorcycle-related Internet e-mail lists or forums - such as Ixion or Bikersweb. Various of these forums are quite receptive to discussing legislation or MAG-related issues. We're not asking that people stand on a soap-box and preach. What we're suggesting is that if an issue comes up, and you're a member of a forum that may be interested, consider raising the matter there, and starting a discussion. Your regional rep (e-mail listed at http://mag-uk.org/contacts.html#reg ) will be interested in hearing the kind of opinions voiced, and any consensus reached. It's probably courteous to the forum to let them know you'll be reporting back when you initially raise the matter. Many forums are sensitive about material being quoted from the forum without permission, so a short summary in your own words may be best. When e-mailing your regional rep on these matters, please include your name, membership number and post-code, for verification purposes. Hopefully, this will result in MAG being better informed of riders' views, and participants in these forums being better represented. |
|||||||
| back
news |
|||||||